The Great Brawl of China
/
The number of times I've been asked by Chinese Americans whether or not I'm "Chinese" is a badge of pride for me. Which is why I'm posting these fun loving links below. There is an on going debate about whether or not Mainland China is a threat to the United States. One argument is that China is a growing economic power and that means the US is in decline. I don't understand this argument, we are both getting richer, why would it matter if China got out in front? A related argument is that with economic superiority, China could build a bigger, scarier military than we have. That's possible. So then the question becomes why would the Chinese see it in their interest to compete with us militarily? To this there are two answers. The first is that the militaries of large powerful countries maintain an order which allows commerce to thrive. That's probably true, but it doesn't matter much to the commercial world which nation is maintaining that order, we all still get rich. Of course a rich country with a large powerful military could decide to pick winners and losers, and in so doing tightly restrict the flow of natural and other resources. Which leads us to the other answer. The Chinese could wish to challenge the US militarily because of past grudges, a feeling of superiority, or because they believe war is fun.If you accept my analysis, than you probably agree that thoughtful diplomacy is very important. And we're not just talking about the yabbos at the State Department, all of us have a role to play in diplomacy.
And with that I give you The Great Brawl of China!
More commentary here, and more video here.
And a "welcoming" greeting to Joe Bidden, perhaps taken out of context by 1000's of news outlets:
"The United States has entered a long period of decline," wrote economist Xia Bin, who advises China's Cabinet and central bank, on his blog.
And Gary Locke kicking ass and taking names with his personal "diplomatic pouch" and the courage to wait in line at Starbucks!
But is Gary Locke really Chinese?


Well,
I don't have much of a commentary on this yet, 
I’ve heard mud walking refers to waist high thick river mud that makes your legs heavy and forward progress difficult. I’ve heard that it is the stickiness of surface mud which creates a delay of the foot finding the ground and mushing in and then holds it back when one tries to pick it up creating an opening and closing of the joints, particularly the hip (kua).
Nearly every video I’ve put on Youtube has at sometime been criticized by some yabo who insists that a STREET FIGHT is the purpose and the meaning of life. While humans have been leveling ground for many centuries, the ubiquity of street pavement is quite new. 150 years ago most fights and surprise attacks happened in mud or dust. That was true on the battle field, in towns, and on country roads. Of course there was snow too, and many other surfaces, some of them level some steep and rocky, but as often as not, the ground was slippery and unstable.
So in my humble opinion, all these explanations of mud walking have their place, but the best explanation is that mud walking is walking on a very slippery surface. A surface where you don’t rely in any way on either forward momentum which pushes off the back foot, nor on rebalancing by using the front foot as a brake. The center of mass must stay over the feet without structural tension, without engaging any posture correcting muscles. In Bagua, the center of mass spins like a top to maintain uprightness with momentum.
For years I went with "something of great quality which takes time to develop" as my definition of Kung Fu. Then I switched to using Kristopher Schipper's definition of Kung Fu in